Religious approach of critics to Atatürk's Revolutions

The Ottoman Empire, established in 1299, developed, spanned and declined like other empires. During the ruling period, quite a few solutions were searched , found,and several reforms were made, but the decay couldn?t be avoided.There are very many differences distinguishing Turkish Revolution from the periodof the Ottoman reforms, of which the most important one is that it is radical and in the form of revolution, called as the term of revolution. However, it was named so after the reforms made by the Ottomans. For, it is impossible to make reforms without going through those stages. Any revolution requires a preparation.Turkish Revolution focused on a wide range of diversity of Reforms not only for the goverment itself and its institutions but also its subjects and the community. Turkish Revolution is absolutely the testimony of consistance. Much as foreign pressures were made and guided by outer powers in the duration of reforms from time to time, Turkish Revolution was never put under the role of foreign powers, but grown with its own internal dynamics.During this period, the most appropriate time was awaited for any revolution, and then, was put into use without giving any concession gradually, decisively and impatiently. National war of indepence constituted the first stage of the revolution interms of sovereigny immediately both in politics and public. The main aim was the changeover to nationalism from the empire, to secularitism from theocracy,and it resulted in the way.