Manuel veya otomatik? Bir kullanıcı arayüzü test karşılaştırması
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
In this paper, a comparison between manual and automation testing methods is conducted within the scope of user interface (UI) testing. To achieve a comprehensive evaluation, multiple metrics have been utilized to analyze each method from various perspectives. Initially, the user interfaces were identified, and corresponding test scenarios were developed. These scenarios were then executed manually and through automated scripts. To ensure reliability and generalizability of the results, the login functionalities of three different web applications were chosen for analysis. Numerical analyses based on selected metrics revealed critical insights regarding the relative advantages and disadvantages of each testing method. Ultimately, the findings of this study offer valuable guidance for companies and projects in deciding which testing approach manual or automated would be most beneficial according to their specific needs.
Author
Zeynep Ceren Bayram
How to Cite
Zeynep Ceren Bayram (Master Thesis). Manuel veya otomatik? Bir kullanıcı arayüzü test karşılaştırması, 2025, Galatasaray University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Galatasaray University
- "Küresel sonlara" karşı yeni anlatılara ve gösterenlere doğru: Şili'nin büyük reddi(2025)
- Natural rights in humanism and transhumanism(2025)
- Lawful use of data in machine learning-based artificial intelligence under the Turkish law(2021)
- Langlands fonktörsellik ilkesi(2021)
- Bir kadın deneyimi olarak kürtajın göstergeler arası çevirisi: Annıe Ernaux'nun Olay adlı romanından Audrey Dıwan'ın Olay başlıklı filmine(2025)
- Measures and sanctions applied to crimes of customs smuggling within the context of the right to property(2022)
