Manuel veya otomatik? Bir kullanıcı arayüzü test karşılaştırması
2025
0 views
0 downloads
Advisor: Prof. Gülfem Isıklar Alptekin
Abstract (EN)
In this paper, a comparison between manual and automation testing methods is conducted within the scope of user interface (UI) testing. To achieve a comprehensive evaluation, multiple metrics have been utilized to analyze each method from various perspectives. Initially, the user interfaces were identified, and corresponding test scenarios were developed. These scenarios were then executed manually and through automated scripts. To ensure reliability and generalizability of the results, the login functionalities of three different web applications were chosen for analysis. Numerical analyses based on selected metrics revealed critical insights regarding the relative advantages and disadvantages of each testing method. Ultimately, the findings of this study offer valuable guidance for companies and projects in deciding which testing approach manual or automated would be most beneficial according to their specific needs.
Author
Dr. Zeynep Ceren Bayram
How to Cite
Zeynep Ceren Bayram (Master Thesis). Manuel veya otomatik? Bir kullanıcı arayüzü test karşılaştırması, 2025, Galatasaray University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Galatasaray University
- International state responsibility arising from new space activities(2025)
- The liability of shareholders and organs for public debts in capital companies(2022)
- Karşı kültürel bir kimlik olarak taraftarlık: istanbul futbol tribünlerinde kimliksel yapılanış biçimleri çalışması(2014)
- Yeni roman: claude simon ve william faulkner(2014)
- Directors and officers liability insurance(2015)
- Langlands fonktörsellik ilkesi(2021)
