Comparative analysis of which the end of history and the clash of civilization thesis

1989's agenda for the year fell almost creating a bomb on the "End of History and the Last Man" work, in a subsequent period, the Clash of Civilizations thesis had received answers to their questions. In Fukuyama these studies, particularly affected in the Soviet Union's disintegration, the defeat of Communism understanding, in the final sense, "Liberal Democracy" that's prevailed, no longer in the post that has Express edits will to dominate the world of this approach. However, his idea of the "End of History" also effected from the words "Hot War" event there would be interpreted as a morestrictly, there have been sighted as Fukuyama is dreamer. But here, the date of the last statement is not meant to end the hot war events any more because it has more than one case mentioned, except that: "Liberal Democracy". This concept has already been found with the body havinging deed the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the United States at the stage of history in the form of a single hegemonic power. Fukuyama has done numerous studies in this study evaluates the quality of theans wers, but the most surprising ideas between them, which was written by S. Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" has been. Huntington later convert it into a book "The Clash of Civilizations" In the article, the past to the presentwar in human history to be effective in the case of this schemeto be effective in this way and transferred to continue the case. Huntington's here, just like Edward Said mentions of Muslim communities about bad adjectives. This society let hargic, put ready, they describe various ways they behave like parasites on such as work. As a result, by analyzing both thinkers have been found to contribute to science has popular names in the perspective of the difference that events experienced through out history. Keywords: Liberal Democracy, Clash of Civilizations, The End of History, Cold War, Communism, Single Hegemonic Power.