Master'sOpen Access

The evaluation of 2005 life sciences curriculum?s applicability in the united classrooms according to the teacher?s ideas (a qualitative thesis)

Is this your thesis?

This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.

2009
0 views
0 downloads

Abstract (EN)

This is a qualitative thesis studied to evaluate the 2005 Life Sciences Curriculum?s applicability in the United classrooms according to the teacher?s ideas. The result of the study is obtained from the teachers who are teaching at 58 different united classrooms both in city center and in the other towns of the province in 2008?2009 Academic Year.I tried to get some information about the teacher?s ideas on the program. I interviewed with some teachers who are teaching at United classes and asked them some questions such as ?What kind of difficulties do you have both in practise and teaching ?? and ? What is your expectations from the program?? A special ?teacher?s poll? which is prepared by consulting to a specialist has been used with the interviews. The datum we get from the study is analyzed and evaluated according to qualitative search techniques.As a result of this study teachers who are teaching at the united classrooms consider that 2005 Life Sciences curriculum is quantitatively positive. However, there are some differences when you compare the united classrooms with separate classrooms which have different circumstances . It has been understood that there are some lackings and difficulties such as students? skill , performance , feeed back , content , teaching and learning period , and evaluation.What is more ,some practical suggestions are given including the ideas of the united classrooms? teachers about the changes on the programme.Key Words: Life Sciences, United Classroom, Constructivism.

Author

Süreyya Şevki Yıldız

How to Cite

Süreyya Şevki Yıldız (Master Thesis). The evaluation of 2005 life sciences curriculum?s applicability in the united classrooms according to the teacher?s ideas (a qualitative thesis), 2009, Afyon Kocatepe University, İlköğretim Bölümü.

License

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

This work is shared under the specified license terms.

More theses from Afyon Kocatepe University