Social Security Institution's sanction authority against private hospitals in practice and its results

Within the scope of this study, the sanction and consequences of the Social Security Institution for private hospitals were examined. These sanctions; The deduction arising from the progress of the private health provider was examined as a warning penalty, administrative fine, stopping penalty and contract termination/recovery of the license. The Social Security Institution is experienced in terms of sanction powers and administrative sanctions, especially in the deductions arising from the entitlement. When the decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals are examined in terms of administrative sanctions, the main reason for interruptions or service disruptions is that non -emergency patients are shown as 'Emergency Patient Introduction'. However, the judicial authority applications of the defendant parties regarding the cancellation of administrative sanctions; The Social Security Institution requires supervision of the transactions such as administrative money, deduction and warning penalties. In addition, the "administrative measure" focused legal sanctions aimed at eliminating the problems that prevent health care services should be "administrative punishment". This is important in the context of showing that hospitals can comply with the rules and laws may be deterrent. Suggestions were developed on the subject expressed in this study; In the context of the legal functions of administrative sanctions, they could make administrative-aggressive requests and that the deductions regarding the penalties were returned in case of unfair proceedings. Places such as the Social Security Institution should be able to obtain administrative penalty responsibilities due to unnecessary procedures and it is determined that this may be important in the judicial authority.