Abdu'r-Rezak Mustâfâ el-Antakî and his work called Ravdatü'l Hakâik (Study and verification)

Scientists have paid attention to studying Arabic and related sciences in ancient and modern times. They have classified the Arabic language as linguistics and semantic sciences. The fact that the Arabic language is rich in areas such as poetry, prose, grammar and grammar, and that it has a close relationship with other sciences has caused its content to diversify. This has also provided those who turn to this field with the opportunity to make efforts at the level of specialization in certain areas. Indeed, the significant amount of rich works related to grammar, which is based on sentence design, has directed scholars to works that deal with certain topics of this science. Independent studies on prepositions are examples of studies in this context. In addition to works that deal with all prepositions, works that deal with some prepositions in particular have been compiled. The works presented under the title of "el-Lamat" and dealing with (ال) are also works compiled in the mentioned style. So much so that this type of writing did not remain at an individual level and took on a traditional structure and was written in various periods. In this study, the work of Abdu'r-Rezzâk Mustafa el-Antaki, which is a part of the tradition in question, "Ravdatü'l Hadâik" was discussed. The study is in the form of verification and examination and aims to take the work in question, which has an important place in the literature of al-lamat, off the dusty shelves and present it to those who study the Arabic language. The study consists of an introduction and two sections. The purpose, scope and importance of the subject are conveyed in the introduction section. In the first section, the religious course of the nshvin is summarized and information about the literature of al-lamat is provided. Then, the period in which the author lived is briefly conveyed and information about his life and works is presented. The author's method of writing and the method he followed in the work are examined. In addition, the path followed in the verification is also expressed in this section. The findings obtained are listed in the conclusion section. In the second section, the work is verified with various copies.