The overview of miscellaneous words in the Qur'an and the translation of the Presidency of Religious Affairs

After taraduf emerged as a concept, conflicts about itself began to emerge. These disagreements arose about whether taraduf is in the language or in the Qur'an. In this study, those who accept taraduf in Arabic and those who do not are presented with their evidences. Afterwards, linguists who accept and do not accept taraduf in the Qur'an are emphasized. Those who do not accept taraduf in the Qur'an, those who accept it in the language and reject it in the Qur'an, those who do not accept it in the Qur'an, the difference between the words they do not accept, and those who do not accept it in Arabic and the Qur'an. given under three headings. When terâduf is accepted in the language, it is considered to be a richness for the language. When it is rejected, it is stated that each word of the language has its own meaning. When taraduf is accepted in the Qur'an, this situation is tied to language, because if there is taraduf in the language, a question arises why there is no taraduf in the divine book written in the same language. Those who do not accept the existence of taraduf in this divine book, when they look at the use of intermittent words in the Qur'an, draw attention to the fact that Almighty Allah does not use the same word in different verses. According to them; If these two alternate words have exactly the same meaning, why isn't the same word used in the verses? Or, since it is not possible to replace the word used in the verse with its alternate, the two words that are teraduf do not mean the same thing. In this study, as a result of the examination of some verses in which some words, which are seen as interchangeable, appear in the source of the Presidency of Religious Affairs, the Qur'an Yolu Turkish Translation and Tafsir, it has been seen that while the translations of some verses are given in the mentioned source, the two words that are alternate are given the same meaning. When the verses in which other alternate words are used are examined, it is observed that taraduf is not accepted and the subtle differences between them are taken into consideration while giving the meanings of the words accordingly. At the same time, it was concluded that the meaning of the verse could have been given by paying attention to its context. When all of these are accepted as probable, it turns out that it cannot be said that the source named Qur'an Yolu Turkish Meal and Tafsir accepts or denies the concept of taraduf. Because not every word that is seen as a successor has been given the same meaning. If the same meaning were given for every word that is alternate, then it would be possible to say that he accepted or rejected the translation.