Morocco and Algeria's policies on the Israel-Palestine question Post-Arab spring: A Comparative analysis

This thesis provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of Morocco and Algeria's foreign policies towards the Israel-Palestine question from 2011 to 2024, with a specific focus on the period following the Arab Spring. The Israel-Palestine question, deeply rooted in historical, political, and social contexts, has seen varied responses from these two North African states. Morocco, traditionally maintaining a moderate stance, has recently shifted towards "normalization" of relations with Israel, influenced by strategic and economic interests, notably the Abraham Accords of 2020. In contrast, Algeria has upheld a staunchly pro-Palestinian stance, driven by its revolutionary history and anti-colonial identity. This study delves into the historical evolution of the question, exploring key events such as the subsequent conflicts and peace initiatives. It analyzes how regional dynamics, particularly after the Arab Spring, have impacted the distinct policies of Morocco and Algeria. This study illustrates the strategic approaches, underlying motivations, and implications of each country's position through a methodical comparative analysis. By offering a thorough analysis of how Morocco and Algeria navigate the challenges of the Israel-Palestine issue while taking into account their distinct political settings and regional aspirations, it aims to contribute to the existing studies. The findings underscore the importance of comprehending the multifaceted nature of regional politics and the diverse perspectives within the Arab world towards the issue. The objective of this study is to provide insight to larger conversations on Middle Eastern geopolitics and the ongoing challenges of the Israel-Palestine question by presenting a nuanced perspective on the policies of Morocco and Algeria.