The opinions of faculties about resources of stagnation in career

The objective of this research is to determine the opinions of the lecturers who are working in Akdeniz University, about their stagnation in their careers. Research is in the mixed method research model, where qualitative and quantitative techniques are used. It was examined whether the opinions of the lecturers about the reasons of exposure to the stagnation in the career and the opinions about the stagnation in the career differ according to gender, marital status, age, title, duration of service in the working organization and duration of service in the same term in accordance with this purpose. Research was carried out with 310 lecturers working at 17 different faculties in the main campus of Akdeniz University. A resources of stagnation in career scale, developed by researcher, which has eight sub-dimensions applied to the lecturers participating in research. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and two way analysis of variance were used in the analysis of data. The Scheffe test, which is a post-hoc method, was used to determine the source of significant interactions among the groups. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS for Windows 23.0 programme. According to the findings, 43.87% of the faculties participating in the research had a stagnation in their career, the child was the important factor in the familial reasons of stagnation, the staff problem was the most important factor in the reasons originating from the organization and the individuals who have suffered from stagnation, mostly entered into this process at post-doctorate, are the results. It was found that there was a significant difference between the opinions of the faculties about the stagnation experienced in the career according to the variables of gender, marital status, age, title, duration of service in the working organization, duration of service in the same title.