Yerleşke tipolojisinin çevre kontrolü parametrelerine, enerji performansına, iç ve dış konfora etkisi

Technological developments have provided significant architectural changes in the developing world in the last century, as in all other sectors. Nowadays, it cannot be denied that all the changes cause challenges like increasing carbon emissions, climate change, scarcity of resources, depletion of fossil fuels, population growth, and urbanization. Therefore, providing an efficient living environment, economy, and society are essential current targets for countries. The European Commission, which provides regulations to decrease the negative impacts of the building sector, is shifting the attention from the building level to the urban level. Since urbanization and the growth rate of the population is increasing rapidly, all countries like Turkey, need to take the responsibility of decreasing the adverse impacts of building stock. This study aims to evaluate the impact of district morphology on environmental control, energy performance, and comfort levels in different climatical regions of Turkey. The prominent uniqueness of the thesis is the integration of three key parameters. These are examining environmental control parameters for the urban morphologies' sun and wind potential, analyzing indoor and outdoor thermal conditions, also indicating energy performance calculations. Therefore, it is aimed to do inclusive research by considering the environment, energy, and human being together. In the methodology, a case study urban block is selected to analyze in Ankara, Turkey. It has 76,183 m² and includes approximately 2,400 dwellers. The case study urban block investigated two different climatical conditions. Ankara has a temperate-dry climate, and İzmir is selected as the representative city of a hot-humid climate. The research methodology consists of three main steps: arranging parametric modeling, conducting performance simulations, and making a comparative assessment. The parametric modeling includes data collection of the site, determining urban scenario variables, and organizing alternative urban block models. Regarding the urban scenario parameters, 28 alternative urban models are arranged. The performance analysis and comparative assessment process are conducted in Grasshopper/Rhinoceros software using a variety of plug-ins like Ladybug 1.4.0, Honeybee 1.4.0, Butterfly 0.0.05, and ClimateStudio1.1.9. The results show that all the beneficial alternatives have a 135° orientation regarding solar radiation analysis, energy performance simulations, computational fluid dynamic analysis outdoor and indoor comfort simulations. The best optimum urban scenario for Ankara belongs to the alternatives of Irregular X-Axis. The model produces the highest electricity thanks to solar streets and provides the lowest final district T.P.E. The final district T.P.E. of Ankara's best district model is 33% lower than the current value. The best optimum urban model for İzmir belongs to the Detached category. The model provides the lowest final district T.P.E, nearly half of the existing situation's final district T.P.E. Eventually, comprehensive research is needed to ensure the best optimum district morphology regarding the urban context and climate. Conducting all important parameters as much as possible highlights the best solution regarding environment, energy, comfort, and renewables.