Ban or regulate: An assessment of lethal autonomous weapon systems (Laws)

ABSTRACT The third revolution in warfare after the use of gunpowder and nuclear weapons would likely be the development of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems. As a result of technological advancements in the area of Artificial Intelligence, there is an increased demand for those weapon systems for use in armed conflict. As Trumbull said "In future wars, victory may depend on "the quality of each side's algorithm" rather than on the skill or bravery of a State's armed forces". Some states invest heavily to improve those weapons. However, the development and deployment of Autonomous Weapon Systems have sparked intense debates regarding their ethical, legal, and societal issues along with arguments for and against using weapons and have even been called for to be banned. Limitations on the use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems as weapons means, and combat methods are covered by International Humanitarian Law both specifically and generally. Further regulations are negotiated at the related forums to pave the way to use those intelligent weapons complying with the existing and potential future regulations. While some advocate for a blanket ban on autonomous weapons, this thesis argues that regulating these weapons is more pragmatic approach that balances security concerns with ethical considerations. This paper also contributes to ongoing discussions and policy deliberations surrounding autonomous weapons and their impact on global security and stability. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, International Humanitarian Law, Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems.