In the computer lesson about usage of keyboard in the side of reaching achievement, the learning methods which are center of learner and teacher were compared.
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
In this research, In The Computer Lesson About Usage of Keyboard In The Side of Reaching Achievement, The Learning Methods Which Are Center of Learner and Teacher Were Compared.In this point of view, in the research;1.It was researched whether there are any meaningful differences between learning level of cognitive and psychomotor fields of the experiment group in which learning methods based on learner centered are applicated , and the control group in which the conventional learning methods are applicated.This experimental study was realized with participation of kahraman maraş andırın too programmed high school students. The research was done on the 40 students which are chosenequally among 9th class students ( 20 of them belong to experiment group and 20 of them belong to control group).In research, the experimental design which is with prior and last control group was used. According to kolmogrov-smirnov?s hyphothesis test, the dipersion of datum of research was normal. As a means of collecting datum, to measure behaviours of cognitive domain, a success test which includes 48 questions was improved ,and to measure the skills of psychomotor domain, an observation test which includes 51 questions was improved. Before they had been applicated on experiment and control group, to measure reliability, two measuremen means were applicated on another group which were belong to the same class level and the interior reliability coefficient was calculated as 0,78.The datums gotten from research were analysised by using statistic package programme and by means of paired samples test. While prior and last test were being analysised, for every question of cognitive domain ,true answers were graded as 1 point,wrong answers were graded 0 point. However, for every questions of psychomotor domain,due to their answers, ?completely? was graded as 5 point, ?partly? was graded as 3 point, ?never? was graded as 1 point. While hypothesises were being tested,the meaninfulness level was taken as p<0.05.According to datums gotten from research,1.There isn?t any meaningful difference between points of prior tests of experiment group and control group.2.There is a meaningful difference between points of last tests of experiment and control group.this difference is in experiment group favour. The arithmetic average of experiment group is 44,35, and the arithmetic average of control group is 21,40.when the defference between points of last tests is kept in mind, about reaching achievement it can be said that learner centered methods are more efficient.3.A meaningful difference was found between points of prior test of the control group on which the conventional teacher -centered teaching is done ,and points of prior test of experiment group on which the learnerCentered teaching is done.4.There is a meaninful difference between points of last test of control and experiment group.the difference is in experiment group?s favour. The arithmetic average of experiment group 235,5 and the arithmetic average of control group is 184,2. About achievement it can be said taht learner centered methods are more effective.The results of research,1. With general statement, in the computer lesson, it was seen that both teacher and learner centered methods are effective to make learner reach achievement and aquire behaviours which belong to cognitive domain of keyboard usage .but, when arithmetic averages are kept in mind, it was seen that the learner centered methods are more effective to make learners acquire behaviours which belong to cognitive domain.2. In the computer lesson, both teacher and learner centered method effective to make the learner acquire the behaviours which belong to knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis,synthesis and evaluation steps of cognitive domain about keyboard usage.but again when the arithmetic average is kept in mind, it was found that the learner centered methods are more efficient to make learners acquire behaviours which belong to knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation steps.3. In the computer lesson, in the process of cognitive domain teaching, the students who are in the control group on which teacher centered method is applicated, had knowledge of behaviour which belong to knowledge step at the end of lesson or teaching of subject. So, to make them aquire behaviours which belong to knowledge step, it was found that the teacher centered method is more effective.4. It was found that in the computer lesson the teacher centered method is more effective to make the learner acquire the behaviours which belong to knowledge, comprehension ,application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation steps of cognitive domain about keyboard usage.5. In the computer lesson in the process of cognitive domain teaching of subject of keyboard usage, the learners of experiment group on which learner centered learning method is applicated had knowledge of behaviours which belong to knowledge, comprehension ,application, analysis,synthesis and evaluation steps. It is found that the learner centered method became efficient to make the learners acquire the behaviours of knowledge step, but on the steps of synthesis and evaluation, there are some differences. The reason of this is that while in the prior test all of students didn?t answer questions of steps of synthesis and evaluation, in the last test all of them answered the questions, so there were?t ant difference between points.6. With a general statement, in the computer lesson, both teacher and learner centered methods are effective to make learner gain skills which belong to psychomotor domain of subject of keyboard usage. But,when the arithmetic average is kept in mind, is was found that the learner centered method is more effective to make learner gain skills of psycho-motor domain.7. In the computer lesson, the teacher and learner centered methods became effective approximately in a same way to make students gain skills which belong to steps of perciving, be established physically,doing with guide, doing in required time and quality, doing in required time quality and sufficiency, making it adapt to situation, and creating of keyboard usage subject.but, when arithmetic average is kept in mind,it is found that learner centered methods are more effective.8. In the computer lesson, when arithmetic averages about keyboard usage are kept in mind, to make learner acquire psychomotor skills ,as the difference of arithmetic average between learner and teacher centered methods is less than the difference of arithmetic average between cognitive domain, the learner centered teaching methods which become effective to make learner gain psycho-motor skills ,is less effective to make them gain behaviours of cognitive domain.so, to cause them gain psychomotor skills , the teacher centered methods are more effective than to make them gain behaviours of cognitive domain.Key Words:Learner Centered Methods,Teacher Centered Methods,Constructivism,Computer Lesson,Usage of Keyboard.
Author
Fatma Şahan
Institution
İnönü University
Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Bilim Dalı
How to Cite
Fatma Şahan (Master Thesis). In the computer lesson about usage of keyboard in the side of reaching achievement, the learning methods which are center of learner and teacher were compared., 2008, İnönü University, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from İnönü University
- Regional threats and opportunities to turkey's national economic security(2022)
- Researching the effect of avenanthramide C on breast cancer(2022)
- The aim of the present study is to examine the etiological origins of cryptogenic cirrhosis in patients who were followed up with the disease(2020)
- Water purification in religions conception of baptism in Christianity(2019)
- Investigation of parents' digital parenting awerness(2020)
- Nutritional monitoring of nutrition in children with cancer(2018)