Master'sOpen Access

Usual conception of evidence and its usuage in administrative law

Is this your thesis?

This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.

2006
0 views
0 downloads

Abstract (EN)

According to Constitution of our country, everyone can defence his/herself withevery kind of evidence that is legal. In there, the meaning of evidence becomesimportant. This disertation analyses the concept of evidence which that used whilealleging or defending and the types of evidence that can available in administrativejurisdiction.In fact Turkish administrative law is roots in French law. But there becomessome difference in practice. For example administrative courts don?t examine thewitness in our country. But most of country that use administrative law solves thisproblem in some other ways like examine this people in an other name instead ofwitness. Of course it?s necessary to solve the cases in fairly. So that this desertationreviews the importance of witness and the place of documents in administrative lawthat which is usually in administration?s hand, authority?s factor, exploration that whichis used in limited meaning in our Turkish administrative law. Finally, necessity of ouradministrative law is reclamation again from the beginning.

Author

Çolpan Mücahit Küçük

How to Cite

Çolpan Mücahit Küçük (Master Thesis). Usual conception of evidence and its usuage in administrative law, 2006, Gazi University.

Keywords

License

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

This work is shared under the specified license terms.

More theses from Gazi University