Procedures for investigation and prosecution of judges and republic prosecutors
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
The judiciary, comprising individuals recognized for their independence and impartiality as mandated by the Constitution, enjoys the assurance of judicial tenure, a principle that transcends any distinction between judges and prosecutors owing to the nature of their judicial functions. It is imperative to underscore that this endowed status conferred upon members of the judiciary should not be misconstrued as a form of privilege but rather as a mechanism designed to cultivate and perpetuate societal trust in the judiciary by facilitating the unfettered and principled discharge of judicial duties. Consequently, akin to other members of society, judges and prosecutors are subject to the imperative of accountability for any transgressions or lapses in their conduct or decisions. Paradoxically, the concept of accountability, ostensibly antithetical to judicial independence, paradoxically serves as a bulwark for safeguarding and fortifying judicial independence. This application of protective measures often navigates a precarious "grey zone" for practitioners, potentially leading to errors in execution. Hence, it is imperative to address and clarify the ambiguities surrounding this aspect to ensure the proper administration of justice and the preservation of individual rights and freedoms. In our scholarly inquiry, meticulous attention has been devoted to navigating the intricacies of procedural and legislative frameworks delineated across various legal statutes. Additionally, we have undertaken a rigorous comparative and critical examination of pertinent jurisprudential doctrines and judicial precedents. Through this approach, we have endeavored to elucidate the intricacies inherent in the processes of criminal investigation and prosecution concerning judges and prosecutors. Leveraging insights from international and comparative legal paradigms, we have sought to provide nuanced analysis and offer informed recommendations aimed at addressing deficiencies and rectifying inaccuracies observed within practical contexts.
Author
Görkem Keysan
How to Cite
Görkem Keysan (Doctorate thesis). Procedures for investigation and prosecution of judges and republic prosecutors, 2024, Hacettepe University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Hacettepe University
- Elementler ve insan doğası arasındaki uyuşmazlık: Ekofobi ve Rönesans İngiliz tiyatrosu(2018)
- Gençlerin ve Gençlik Çalışanlarının Gözünden Gençlik Politikaları ve Hizmetlerinin Değerlendirilmesi(2022)
- Characterization of Ayvalik (Edremit yaglik) extra virgin olive oils volatile compounds with SPME-GC/MS and Raman spectroscopy(2018)
- An analysis of the intonation patterns of if-clauses in Turkish English majors(2017)
- A critical evaluation of pronunciation teaching in an ELT department in Turkey(2023)
- The effect of child labor related boycott threat on Ivory Coast cocoa production(2018)