Evidence in administrative judgement and tools wich are using to prove

Evidence, which directly has effects on a person who files a claim incourt to get positive or negative outcomes, is one of the most importantsubjects in jurisdiction law. Tools which are using to prove (evidences) inevidentiary resources are used in the proof of claims alleged and revealingmaterialistic truth.The purpose of administrative judgment, which plays a role in realizingstate of law by means of judgmental auditing of administration, is to providejuridical security of individuals and enable administration to act in parallel withthe law so as to acquire public benefit. For this purpose, administrativeJudgment authorities have been given to act officially (ex- mero motu);besides claimant and defendant conducts have undertaken liabilities andduties.In the process of administrative judgment, administrative judgmentauthorities are brought restrictions in terms of subjects against writtenexercise of jurisdiction, in addition, naturally given authority to investigate allsorts of evidences. Especially, testimony evidences are not implemented dueto the fact that it has contradictory characters against written exercise ofjurisdiction. In this dissertation, opinions, based on the facts that sides haveto struggle to prove their assertions, evidence obligations in some cases ofadministrative judgment should be implemented, it is a must foradministrative judgment authorities to apply for testimony evidences indisputes and for this purpose an arrangement needs to be made, the lists ofexpert witnesses should be prepared in administrative judgment as made injudicial judgment too, suggestions related to the content of the lists of expertwitnesses should be presented and fact- finding before filing a claim in courtcan also be got from judicial and administrative judgment places, have beendefended.