Master'sOpen Access

The problem of evil from two different perspectives the example of Augustinus and Ibn Sina

Is this your thesis?

This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.

2024
0 views
0 downloads

Abstract (EN)

There is no human being who has not experienced evil on his own. With the inclusion of philosophical thought in our lives more, this subject has begun to be examined more. The problem of evil has an important place in theism and aism. It was formulated and edited for the first time by Epicurus and has been processed by many philosophers throughout the history of philosophy. Maintaining defenses and theodicy to protect the causes of evil. Theodicies, which claim that there are just reasons for the emergence of evil, have been influenced by the world of the age and the views of philosophy. In this study, Augustine, one of the philosophers, deals with the problem of evil and the framework of theodicy. Augustine, who finds the evil in the free will of man, has been an influential name in the thoughts of God in the middle of the views that are not responsible for the evils in the universe. The other philosopher of the study is Ibn Sînâ. The problem of hatred has been a controversial issue in the protection of Islam, especially in peripatetic cleansing. Ibn Sînâ was optimistic about the problem of evil. According to Avicenna, absolute evil does not exist in the universe, the main thing is goodness, evil is accidental and passes through matter.

Author

Enes Üzülmez

How to Cite

Enes Üzülmez (Master Thesis). The problem of evil from two different perspectives the example of Augustinus and Ibn Sina, 2024, Kütahya Dumlupınar University.

License

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

This work is shared under the specified license terms.

More theses from Kütahya Dumlupınar University