Opening a public case and returning the indictment
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
With the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code numbered 5271 on 01.06.2005, the provisions of "return and acceptance of the indictment" took place for the first time in our criminal legislation. With this regulation, as explained in the decisions of the Supreme Court, in accordance with the principles of "The Right of Persons not to be Spotted" and "Full Investigation and Hearing in One Session", the public prosecutors carrying out the investigation should collect all the evidence in a reasonable time, should prosecute actions only when they consider to result in conviction, and should not prosecute actions if they deem will result in acquittal, that is, they are intended to serve as a kind of filter. In this context, it will be possible to proceed to the prosecution phase in a complete and accurate collection of all evidence during the investigation phase. Since the court will not have to collect evidence again during the prosecution phase, the dispute subject to the investigation can be decided in one session. Thus, the "right to a fair trial" in Article 6 of the ECHR and the "right to trial within a reasonable time" included in the last paragraph of Article 141 of our Constitution that is integrated with the right to a fair trial have been reflected in our criminal legislation. When the decisions of the Supreme Court against the decision to return the indictment are examined, it cannot be said that the provisions of the acceptance and return of the indictment have achieved their purpose. In addition, in the legal regulations (CPC Art. 170,174), there are elements that may constitute a violation of the essence of the right to a fair trial given in the 6th article of the ECHR. The changes made with the law numbered 7188 in 2019 were also not sufficient. The issues constituting a violation of the essence of the right to a fair trial due to the problems in implementation and the legal regulation should be eliminated by new and comprehensive legal regulations, hereby, the "return and acceptance of the indictment" should be made in accordance with the last paragraph of Article 141 of our Constitution and the essence of Article 6 of the ECHR.
Author
Fetih Gölcü
Institution
How to Cite
Fetih Gölcü (Master Thesis). Opening a public case and returning the indictment, 2021, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University
- Bayburtlu Ağlar Baba Divanı's contextual index and functional dictionary(2025)
- Anatolia and Anatolian people in Ömer Bedrettin Uşaklı’s poems(2022)
- From a Schmıttian perspective, ideological divisions and the state's efforts to homogenize society in 20th century Türkiye (2026)
- The effect of peer mathematics anxiety on students’ mathematics anxiety and achievement(2026)
- The role of fear of missing out in social environments and nomophobia as a situational mediator in the relationship between self-control and academic procrastination in adolescent athletes(2026)
- The conditional indirect role of mindfulness and perceived social support in the relationship between mind-wandering and psychological flexibility through stress in athletes(2026)
