Protecting the shoreline with legal regulations and judicial decisions: Antalya example

All along the coastal areas, the people choose to live in places that were in the first place. As a natural consequence of this choice, more population along the coast, with the more concrete in industrial and tourism facilities, and pollution encountered. On the other hand, shores were seen as a resourse to profit much. For that reason the coasts are under pressure. To minimize the pressures on the shoreline the use of coastal with preserving them, as a result of different policies and different policies concerning the law is enacted. The most important way is legal arregements to use the coastral areas by preventing. Because of ıncorrect procedures about coastal and coastal regions are encountered irreversible problems. Last 20-30 years the coastal areas of our country is seen as a resource to refresh the economy rather than a wealth of natural. The dominant approach is based on the money and profit system, the economy was based on legal regulations making itdifficult to protect the coasts. The shorelines are not protected with legal arrangement which ignore the public interest. In this study, we try to answer the question that legal regulationswhether if protecs shorelines or not and causing the results on shores of Antalya current laws were surveyed, constitution codes of laws, the statutory decrees that to become effective newwere limited. The concepts like public interest, freedom, unpaid, gained rights about the shoreline and the effects of the regulations on the sectors are studied. In second part of thestudy, planning activities and results on Lara Shoreline are inspected and legal regulations are commented on judicial decisions with Antalya.