Comparison of Tatar Turkish, Turkmen Turkish and Uzbek Turkish in terms of morphology

In our thesis study, in which we chose Turkmen Turkish from the Oghuz group, Uzbek Turkish from the Karluk group and Tatar Turkish from the Kipchak group, the mentioned dialects were examined in terms of morphology. "How are Turkmen Turkish, Uzbek Turkish, Tatar Turkish related to each other?", "What are their similarities and differences in terms of morphology?", "What is the relationship between Turkmen Turkish, Uzbek Turkish, Tatar Turkish and Old Turkish?", "These dialects are similar to Old Turkish. What morphological features do they have?", "What are the functional similarities of the dialects evaluated?" Answers to questions such as these were sought. A conclusion was reached based on the questions. In our study, Turkmen, Uzbek and Tatar Turkish languages were examined in terms of inflectional suffixes, derivational suffixes and word types. In the introduction, which is the first part of the study, the name, literature, history, geography of Uzbek, Turkmen and Tatar Turkish and the classification of Turkish dialects are discussed. In the second part, morphology was introduced and a comparison of three dialects was made with the titles of nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions and exclamations. In the third section, which is the last section, production annexes; It was examined in three dialects under the titles of suffixes that make nouns from nouns, suffixes that make verbs from nouns, suffixes that make nouns from verbs, and suffixes that make verbs from verbs. At the end of the third chapter, there is also a conclusion and bibliography section. Key Words: Turkmen Turkish, Tatar Turkish, Uzbek Turkish, Morphological Comparison, Morphology, Language Analysis, word types, Contemporary Turkish Dialects