Understanding progressive nature of science based on history and philosophy of science perspective: Thomson, Rutherford and Bohr atom theories
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
Many researchers demonstrated the importance of history and philosophy of science (HPS) for understanding the nature of science (NOS) and its progress. The aim of this study is to facilitate pre-service science teachers' understanding of the NOS of through using a content prepared in the perspective of HPS. Several studies demonstrated that physics and chemistry textbooks have serious epistemological problems compared to current philosophy of teaching of science. This situation causes a lack of understanding the NOS and scientific progress. In a Lakatosian framework a big number of textbooks physics and chemistry used widely analyzed by Mansoor Niaz and his colleagues and almost all of them found lacking depicting of the NOS and scientific progress but Leon Cooper's textbook. Cooper's book was evaluated as adequate due to its content presentation in the perspective of HPS. In this study, 34 pre-service science teachers, who has already taken general chemistry course in which one of the analyzed low graded textbook was used, are participants. Half of participants were chosen randomly as control group and remaining was participated as experimental group. The study includes a pre-test, and instruction phase and a post-test same as pre-test. In this quasi experimental study, both tests were given to both group, but only experimental group participated to the intervention or instruction phase. The tests were combinations of a modified version of VNOS and criteria developed by Mansoor Niaz in a Lakatosian theoretical framework of history and philosophy of science and scientific progress. The tests were used to reveal participants's views on the NOS and scientific progres. Chapter of atomic theories was held in instruction phase in the perspective of HPS according to criteria developed by a previous study. In the end the effect of an instruction prepared in the perspective of HPS on the understanding of the NOS and scientific progress is evaluated and it was seen that a content prepared in the perspective of HPS in a Lakatosian theoretical framework had a positive effect on understanding and conceptions of pre-service science teachers about the NOS and scientific progress.
Author
Zekai Ayık
Institution
Yıldız Technical University
Division of Science Education
How to Cite
Zekai Ayık (Master Thesis). Understanding progressive nature of science based on history and philosophy of science perspective: Thomson, Rutherford and Bohr atom theories, 2017, Yıldız Technical University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Yıldız Technical University
- A ruled-based software model in the preliminary design phase of housing: Example of Mardin(2008)
- An investigation on the relationship between problem solving and critical thinking skill, and academic achievement of vocational and technical high school students(2017)
- Numerical investigation of single bubble flow boiling both on a flat surface and on a cavity in horizontal pipe and pool boiling on a flat surface(2018)
- Examination of the categories in which buildings with LEED v3 and v4 certificates score the lowest points in Turkey(2018)
- Examining ?Historical housing structures" within the confines of protecting ecological balance(2012)
- Approximate solutions of integral equations(2012)