Dentistry SpecialtyOpen Access

Comparison of water absorption of 3D printing resins and conventional composite resins

Is this your thesis?

This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.

2025
0 views
0 downloads

Abstract (EN)

Aim: This study aimed to compare the water sorption of a nanohybrid composite resin and two 3D-printed resin materials over varying storage periods. Materials and methods: A total of 60 cylindrical specimens (8.0 mm diameter and 2.0 mm thickness) were prepared and divided into three groups (n=20) based on the materials used: a nanohybrid composite (Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, NC, Japan) and two 3D-printed resin materials (Saremco Crowntec, SC, Switzerland; VarseoSmile Crown Plus, VS, Germany). NC specimens were fabricated using stainless steel molds, while SC and VS specimens were prepared using a Phrozen Sonic Mini 8K MSLA 3D printer (Phrozen Technology, Taiwan). Post-processing for SC and VS included immersion in ethanol for 5 minutes and UV curing at 405 nm for 20 minutes. All specimens were stored in a desiccator until a constant mass was achieved and then immersed in distilled water. Water sorption (WS) was evaluated according to ISO 4049:2009 standards at 1, 7, 30, and 90 days. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test at a significance level of p<0.05. Results: The nanohybrid composite (NC) exhibited significantly higher water sorption values at all time points compared to the 3D-printed groups (SC and VS) (p<0,05). Between the 3D-printed resins, SC showed significantly higher water sorption than VS at 1 and 7 days(p<0,05) however, no significant difference was observed at 30 and 90 days(p>0,05). All materials demonstrated a rapid increase in water sorption in the first week, followed by a slower rate of absorption as storage time progressed. Conclusions: The nanohybrid composite (NC) exhibited greater water sorption compared to the 3D-printed resin materials. These findings suggest that 3D-printed resin materials, may be a suitable alternative for long-term clinical restorations. Keywords: Water sorption, Nanohybrid composite, 3D-printed permanent crown material, Dental materials.

Author

Zeliha Işıl Metin

How to Cite

Zeliha Işıl Metin (Dentistry Specialty Thesis). Comparison of water absorption of 3D printing resins and conventional composite resins, 2025, Ordu University.

Keywords

License

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

This work is shared under the specified license terms.

More theses from Ordu University