The nature of proving in belief and knowledge and friendly atheism

The first part of this study focuses on the characteristics of justified information, the nature of justification and the types of justification in different fields. In addition, the reflections of justification on emotion and ethics and the similarity of mathematical paradoxes are shown to be valid in moral judgments and it is revealed that it is not easy to overcome paradoxical situations in moral judgments. In the second part of the study, the nature of emotions is clarified by showing that paradoxical thoughts are at the center of theoretical conflicts between theists and atheists, and the analyzes of the nature of friendly atheism which has been on the agenda of philosophers in recent years are given. Friendly atheism is an attempt to reveal the most sympathetic interpretation of atheism on the basis that religious beliefs or atheism are not the kind of debate that can be finalized by senses or pure reason. It is seen that friendly atheism debates occupy an important place in sharing the blessings of the world between theists and atheists with justice and fairness, grounding human relations, eliminating hate speeches and creating a more beautiful world. In this study, moral paradoxes are brought to light and how best to interpret friendly atheism is revealed. All these discussions are based on meaningful analysis of the nature of emotions.