The comparison of al-Kashshaf and al-Bahru'l-Muhit commentary in terms of declarative science

Language has also been different to structures such as reading. In general, there are many interpretations that change when it is divine. In a sense, the science of declaration is to learn a language from the language with the words obtained from the closure and the developments in terminology. It is obvious that the syntax of these people, which is the subject of this science, will increase different perceptions. In the Qur'an, rhetoric has been taken in particular. On the other hand, having different dispositions, thoughts and ideas, or living in various times and societies can also cause the Qur'an to be understood without being understood due to its characteristics. In addition, their languages are also branches of development related to other sciences, stagnation or regression issues. Zemahseri and Abu Hayyân present a healthy life in terms of both ideas and time. In this study, we examined Zamakhshari's Discovered Tafsir and this description of Abû Hayyân's work called el-Bahru'l-Muhît. Because of the interpretation of the Qur'an, it reflects the views on creed and the Karim. In addition, we aimed to reveal that Abû Hayyân did not make a contribution to the science of beyân -because of his tafsir-he was there two centuries after Zamakhshari.