Examination of science education curriculum within the scope of 2015 TIMSS and 2018 LGS
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
In addition to international studies, Turkey also revises its national education system. Turkey raised the duration of compulsory education from 8 to 12 years, which made high school education also compulsory. Students take AHS (Access to High Schools) to enter high schools and receive high-quality education. Therefore, exams mean a great deal to students and their parents. For this reason, this exams are also called high stakes exams in the literature. Exam results are an important criterion for the assessment of the effectiveness of curricula in Turkey. There is no doubt that AHS results also affect TIMSS results. Therefore, curricula are revised in line with needs and developments. Science Course Curriculum (SCC) was revised in 2013 and then revised again in 2017 and 2018 and implemented at all grade levels. Given that SCC prepares students for AHS and TIMSS, it is imperative that the compatibility of these three exams be examined. The aim of this study is to compare SCC (2018), TIMSS (2015) and AHS (2018) in terms of content domains, cognitive domains and learning outcomes. Case study, which is a qualitative research method, was used in this study. Data were analyzed using document review matrices to determine the similarities and differences between the learning outcomes of SCC, TIMSS and AHS. SCSS and AHS science questions were also classified according to TIMSS cognitive domains. Results show that the learning outcomes of the fields of physics, biology and earth sciences of TIMSS (2015) are compatible with those of all grade levels of SCC (2018) and that the learning outcomes of chemistry are compatible with those of the seventh and eighth grades. Most of AHS (2018) questions are compatible with the learning outcomes of SCC (2018), however, the latest revision in the curriculum has introduced some eighth grade learning outcomes to other grade levels. AHS (2018) science questions measure higher-level skills better than TIMSS (2015) science questions. The subject area of the "Living Creatures and Life" of SCC (2018) has the most learning outcomes in the levels of "knowing" and "reasoning" while the subject area of the "Physical Phenomena" has the most learning outcomes in the levels of "application." Besides, the seventh-, fifth- and eighth-graders have the most learning outcomes in the levels of "knowing," and "application" "reasoning," respectively. We hope that the results will contribute the literature in improvement of science curricula and interpretation of national and international exams.
Author
Burcu Pedük
Institution

Manisa Celal Bayar University
Division of Science Education
How to Cite
Burcu Pedük (Master Thesis). Examination of science education curriculum within the scope of 2015 TIMSS and 2018 LGS, 2019, Manisa Celal Bayar University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Manisa Celal Bayar University
- Investigation of the relationship of internet addiction level of high school students with parents' attitudes: The case of Manisa(2019)
- Analysing the social integration process of yezidi refugee youngs in the context of multiculturalist social work(2016)
- The security matter of Turkey?s Islands? sea (Eagean sea)(2007)
- Middle income trap problem in terms of sustainable growth resources in Turkiye(2023)
- Examining the leadership styles of fitness center managers according to their organizational response to the crisis: The Covid-19 outbreak case(2023)
- Evaluation of logistics-environmental interactive performances of EU countries and Turkey through environmental efficiency DEA methods in the scope of green logistics(2023)