A linguistic analysis on ki?tabu bulgatu'l-muştak fì lugatit-Türk we'l-kipçak

In our thesis of historical document, Kipchak Turkish was written in Arabic script by the Kit?bu Bul?atu?l-Muşt?? fì Lu?ati?t-Türk we?l-Kıfç?? studies, were Turkish transcription, a comparative analysis has been made in terms of language. Working Foreword, Introduction,, Resources and Results sections. BM had been added original copy at the end of the study. Main sections of this study consist of İnroduction and Analysis, introduction part consists of: 1 kiptchak and memluk language 2. Dictionaries and grammers which had written in memluk period and given brief information and the most important works published on these books 3. Kit?bu Bul?atu?l-Muşt?? fì Lu?ati?t-Türk we?l-Kıfç?? title?s was talking about the author, the place where the author had written the book and Characteristics of the language and the orthographical features.In the second part Analysis: studies done so far about BM; general vocabulary, word structure, types of words, and words of foreign origin. Also in this section, we compare the lexical entries of BM to those those of Divanü Lûgati-Türk ve Codex Cumanicus, Kitâbü?l-İdrâk li Lisâni?l-Etrâk, Kitâb-ı Mecmû u Tercümân-ı Türkî ve Acemî ve Mugalî, Ettuhfet-üz-Zekiyye Fil-Lûgat-it-Türkiyye, El-Kavânînü?l-Külliyye li-Zabti?l-Lûgati?t-Türkiyye, Ad-Durrat al-Mu?î?a fi-l-Lu?at at-Turkîyye which belong to Mamluk-Kipchak Turkish and İbni Mühanna Dictionary that was written in Khorezm region.In the conclusion; in this thesis attempt to Kit?bu Bul?atu?l-Muşt?? fì Lu?ati?t-Türk we?l-Kıfç?? in the light of sources. Infornations had try to be given explanatory not judgemently with the limitation of methodology and science.Anahtar Kelimeler:1.Kipchak2.The Mameluke3.Lu?ati?t-Türk4.Dictionary