The taki̇ng and discussion of evidence in the criminal procedure in the light of principle of adversari̇al tri̇al
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
The subject of this thesis is the principle of adversarial trial, which is one of the most important consequences of the right to a fair trial, and which is dominate to procedure law, and in the light of this principle, the taking and discussion of evidence in criminal procedure. In this context, in the first part of the thesis, the principle of contradictory reasoning is discussed, and then the substitution of evidence and discussion in criminal procedure is mentioned. In the third part of the thesis, in the context of substitution and discussion of the evidence, the method of direct questioning, which has a special feature of the statement evidence, is examined.
Author
Mehmet Korkmaz
Institution
How to Cite
Mehmet Korkmaz (Master Thesis). The taki̇ng and discussion of evidence in the criminal procedure in the light of principle of adversari̇al tri̇al, 2020, İstanbul University.
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from İstanbul University
- Determination of total anthocyanin, caretenoid andantioxidant capacity of black goji berry (Lycium ruthenicummurr.) fruits(2021)
- Abulfaz Elchibey and his family life(2021)
- In the covid 19 pandemic of female employees at a university hospital attitudes and affecting factors in nutrition of 9 months-6 years old children(2022)
- New surveillance paradigms in the COVİD-19 era: Critical discourse analysis on a cross-secti̇onal sample of Health Minister Fahrettin Koca's twitter posts(2022)
- Buying and selling precious documents in terms of Islamic Law(2022)
- Analysis of clinical correlation of radiological imaging in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by quantitative computed tomography(2020)