Hegel ve Spinoza'da yurttaşlık ve özgürlük: Pro Patria Mori kavramının eleştirisi
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
The definition of citizenship in different forms of government provides a framework for the perception of freedom. The fact that Hegel is in favor of constitutional monarchy, and Spinoza of democracy is an indicator that their definitions of citizenship differs. On the one hand, in Hegel, the citizen is limited to being a part of political state, a higher reality than individuals. On the other hand, in Spinoza, state is nothing but a product of the effort of citizens to persevere in their being. This thesis aims at analyzing and discussing different points of view of these philosophers about sacrificing one's life for the country and the right to live, based on their ontological systems and political philosophies.
Author
İrem Güven
Institution
How to Cite
İrem Güven (Master Thesis). Hegel ve Spinoza'da yurttaşlık ve özgürlük: Pro Patria Mori kavramının eleştirisi, 2018, Galatasaray University.
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Galatasaray University
- Natural rights in humanism and transhumanism(2025)
- International state responsibility arising from new space activities(2025)
- Yeni roman: claude simon ve william faulkner(2014)
- Kentsel dünyanın 3D algısı için derin öğrenme tabanlı tespit ve segmentasyon(2025)
- Langlands fonktörsellik ilkesi(2021)
- Lawful use of data in machine learning-based artificial intelligence under the Turkish law(2021)
