Evaluations of children and parents on parental lies
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
Piaget (2015) stated that the evaluation and justification of children's lying behavior in moral terms change according to cognitive developmental stages. Studies conducted on the paradigm of disappointing gift, a white lie area, have observed that it is found more acceptable compared to other areas of lies (Aydın, 2021; Warneken & Orlins, 2015; Gingo, Roded, & Turiel, 2019). The aim of this research is to investigate how children and parents evaluate and justify the lies told by parents. Participants were presented with seven different stories as data collection tools, and they were asked to assess and justify these stories. The participants in the first study were 35 children in the 5-6 age group and 35 children in the 10-11 age group. The participants in the second study were 68 parents with children aged 5-12. The results of the research revealed, in line with previous studies, that the most acceptable lie category is the disappointing gift paradigm, which falls under the category of white lies.
Author
Işılay Çevik
Institution
MEF University
Division of Guidance and Psychological Counseling
How to Cite
Işılay Çevik (Master Thesis). Evaluations of children and parents on parental lies, 2023, MEF University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from MEF University
- A critical study on sustainability within environmental assessment methodologies: Evaluating Volu-te in search of an alternative vision in architecture(2022)
- The legal position of the promiser in the commitment of the third parties act(2022)
- The use of pretrained language models in sentiment analysis(2022)
- The formation of the Pakistani taliban: İnternal and external dynamics(2022)
- Rwanda and radicalization(2022)
- Post travmatic stress disorder and related factors of combat veterans in Turkey: A systematic review(2022)