A comparison of es-Seʿâlibîs Fikhü'l-luğa and es-Süyûtî's el-Muzhir fî-ʿUlûmi'l-luğa and Envâʿuh

As it is in many disciplines there complaint of concept confusion in Arabic language. to understand a discipline clearly it is important to understand the concepts of that discipline precisely, in addition in what way that discipline used those concepts in terms of meaning and content. All the knowledge about the Arabic language, especially at the loeginning of its appearance and the branching of sconces were spoken about by the man of knowledge taking into consideration all knowledge related to sharia. this why the Arabic language sciences appeared to serve the sharia sciences in particular and become a complement of the sharia. at first scientists began to speak about nahiv and sarf and language and philology. So this branch of science covered, in addition to concepts mentioned above, irap, subject object and verb. in the same way it cornered coherence attribution. Match and fusion. Also it complied creation, election, dialects and formal language. This why all these sciences are interrelated with linguistics, philology and other concepts. so we change say that the importance of this science is coming from this interrogation. consequently, we can say that linguistics is the fruit of efforts done through the last four centuries Ebü'l-Feth Osmân b. Cinî el-Mevsılî el-Bağdâdî (392/1002) is the scientis who began this science in his book Elhasais, but he did n9t name this science until Ebü'l-Hüseyn Ahmed b. Fâris b. Zekeriyyâ b. Muhammed er-Râzî el-Kazvînî el-Hemedânî (395/1004) came and gave the title el-Sahibi fi fikhi-l-luga. One of these books is the book 42 Fikhu (l-Luga " by ebû mansûr abdülmelik b. muhammed b. ismâîl es-Saalibî'nin (429/1038) later it was given different names as far as content is concerned. Secondly Suyuti's (911) el-muzhir first ulumi-l-luga comes in the second place. Every scientis named his book depending on the sciences spread in due present tivne howere there is no evidence indicating the differentiation between the intention of es-Seâlibî and suyuti. Were es-Seâlibî and suyuti aware of the difference between fikhul-luga(philology) and ilmu-luga? Or was this naming was giving the same meaning for both books? This is what we are going to discuss. We are going to regard es-Seâlibî and suyuti's fikhul-luga (philology) and ilmu-l-luga(linguistics) in comparison with modern philology because they have something to do with linguistics concepts. At the seme time we are going to stady both these scientists individually and will see the reason laying behind their study and we are going to study their books and different title.