Kant's Theory of Cosmopolitanism and it's impact on contemporary cosmopolitan approaches

The main argument of the thesis is that Kant's cosmopolitanism isn't independent from the context of needs. The assertion of Kant's cosmopolitanism is to be able to include everyone and to represent the interest of all. In this sense it's represents itself position as excluded and isolated from the needs. But cosmopolitanism as a product of political and social needs, repress other needs, especially the needs that were represented by community and social system. While the differentiation of needs, the basis of the social differences is, the recognition of differences exhibit as problematic and limited. In the first chapter I followed the roots of this problematic, in the second chapter I have tried to understand the dimensions of this problematic by Kant and in the last chapter by the Kantian cosmopolitans.