Evaluation of the reliability of posteroanterior analysis used with conventional and computerized methods
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
Evaluation of the Reliability of Posteroanterior Analysis Used with Conventional and Computerized MethodsCephalometric radiography is a widely used diagnostic tool for evaluation of craniofacial complex, assessment of morphology and growth, diagnosis and treatment planning, evaluating results of growth and the effects of orthodontic treatment. Lateral cephalograms provide pertinent information on skeletal, dental and soft tissue morphology and relationships, whereas posteroanterior cephalograms provide information on skeletal and dentoalveolar relationships in the transverse plane and are used primarily to assess skeletal and dental asymmetries. The aim of this study is to compare measurements on posteroanterior radiographs that was traced with conventional and computer-aided cephalometric analysis and evaluate reliability of techniques. Pre-treatment posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs of 150 patients were used in this study. Direct digital posteroanterior radiographs were traced using Pordios for Windows (Institute of Orthodontic Computer Science, Denmark) software program. Conventional radiographs were obtained from digital radiographs using dry laser imager. Intraclass correlation coefficients were found below 0,90 for 6 of 25 parameters between two methods. However, reliability of all parameters were above 0,75. According to the paired t and Wilcoxon tests, statistically significant differences were found in all parameters except for 2 parameters (inter-canine width, buccal overjet of right molar), but differences between measurements were clinically acceptable. Measurement of mandibular width was the least reliable parameter. As a result, computer-aided posteroanterior cephalometric analysis method was found time saving and reliable, and was found to be a good alternative to conventional method.Key Words: Cephalometry, posteroanterior radiographs, reliability
Author
Sevim Seda Erken
How to Cite
Sevim Seda Erken (Doctorate thesis). Evaluation of the reliability of posteroanterior analysis used with conventional and computerized methods, 2011, Başkent University.
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Başkent University
- Classification of aircraft images(2025)
- A nietzschean reading of cormac Mccarthy's Blood Meridian Or the Evening Redness in the west and The Road(2021)
- An analysis of the alignment of English textbooks in Turkish primary schools with the 21st century skills(2025)
- The gastronomic heritage of tradesmen's restaurants: The case of Ankara(2025)
- The impact of vocational education on the skilled labor shortage: A study on the construction sector in Ankara province(2025)
- Effect of using eye mask and earplugs in preventing delirium in intensive care patients(2022)
