The comparative commentary between surah of Najm and commentary named Rûhu'l-Meânî and Tahrir et-Tenvi̇r
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
It is the first time in which the prophetic verse contains a verse in Surah Najm. It is the fifty third surah of our book. One of the surahs of Mecca. This time is important in terms of telling the most important miracles of our Lord. We especially see the Israeli incident and the position of our Lord in more detail. Surah Najm supported our Lord in all matters. In particular, the revelation of everything he says has revealed a distinct value and position to our Prophet. Âlusi and İbn Âşur are mufisirs that both blended in the dirac and narrative commentary to each other. They tried to convey the thought system of song and garb in terms of their geography. We tried to show both classical and modern ideas. Before explaining the surah, we tried to explain why we prefer the surah Necim after explaining the importance and need of the commentary in the introduction and explaining the inferences from the verses by using different sources. We have seen that the Ulama generally interpreted the narratives differently in almost twenty verses as well as alliance. In the Garanik incident, our Prophet was supported in every aspect and the accusations and corruption of the polytheists were frustrated. The principle of personal responsibility has been established in the surah and it has been demonstrated that no one is responsible for the actions of any person, not anyone. Even though centuries passed over the Qur'an's verse, '' It is still alive and alive as if it had been new." rule was tried to be explained. The verses were compared and mucarren method was applied. The focus was on lonely meaning, without going through too much of an analysis. The main topic was noted without using too many titles. The reason why we do not introduce commentators and commentaries is to explain the inferences of the verses. We did this work by thinking in the style of commentary mev'zui. We have tried to get the issues we usually seek in the exegesis. Key words: Necm Surah, Alusi, Ibn Âsur, tafsir
Author
Cemil Demir
Institution

Yalova University
Division of Basic Islamic Sciences
How to Cite
Cemil Demir (Master Thesis). The comparative commentary between surah of Najm and commentary named Rûhu'l-Meânî and Tahrir et-Tenvi̇r, 2019, Yalova University.
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Yalova University
- Foreign currency debts(2020)
- Turkey's Eastern Mediterranean policy(2022)
- A research on mothers of children in need of special education with psychosocial approach(2019)
- El-insanü beyne'l-kerâmeti ve'lihânet'd-dünyeviyyeti fi'l-Kur'âni'l Kerîm (Dirâseten mevdû'iyyeten)(2023)
- Saint Simon's role in the development of sociological thought and his approach to religion(2025)
- The Tariq of Istanbul-The Maslak of Shmad as-Sufi in our qiraah tradition: Its usool, preferences and its comparison with schools(2025)