The problem of human freedom from the perspective of William James in the context of pragmatic ethics
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
Freedom is one of the most fundamental and complex concepts in philosophy. Throughout history, philosophers have developed various approaches to understand what freedom is and how it operates. This thesis aims to examine the problem of freedom within the ethical framework of pragmatism and analyze William James's conception of freedom. Pragmatism emerged as a philosophical movement starting with Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and later shaped by the contributions of Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), William James (1842-1910), and John Dewey (1859-1952). This movement adopts a flexible ethical understanding based on changing circumstances, rather than fixed ethical principles. While Peirce laid the theoretical foundations of pragmatism, James introduced this philosophy to a broader audience. William James taught physiology and psychology at Harvard University and established the first psychology laboratory in America. His work focused on consciousness and the functions of the mind, making significant contributions to both psychology and philosophy. James made important contributions to psychology with his 1890 publication The Principles of Psychology. In 1898, he declared himself a pragmatist and advocated for his experimental pragmatism in opposition to realism and idealism. His 1907 book Pragmatism is one of the key texts of this philosophical movement. As one of the leading figures of pragmatism, James introduced this philosophy to a wider audience and argued that ethical decisions should be based on learning from experience. William James defines free will as the capacity for conscious choice and emphasizes that individuals have the power to shape their own destiny. In Pragmatism, he states that free will encourages individuals to make ethical decisions through learning from their experiences. James sees freedom as a fundamental condition for personal self-realization and argues that this capacity lies at the core of human existence. However, he also notes that the limits of freedom should be defined according to the structure of society. Keywords: History of Philosophy, William James, Freedom, Ethics, Free Will
Author
Fadile Ayğan
Institution

Siirt University
Din Bilimleri Bilim Dalı
How to Cite
Fadile Ayğan (Master Thesis). The problem of human freedom from the perspective of William James in the context of pragmatic ethics, 2024, Siirt University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Siirt University
- Investigation of social, spatial and structural problems in the movement of historical urban settlements (Batman Hasankeyf example)(2022)
- Synthesis of novel schiff bases derived from 4-chloro-2-nitrophenol and salicylaldeyhde; preparation their metal complexes, and theoretical nmr computations by gaussian program(2013)
- Investigating the effect of sodium metaborate exi̇stence on sodium borohydride?s hydrogen storage capacity(2011)
- Effect of some parameters on the diffusion coefficient and metastable zone of lithium metaborate dihydrate(2014)
- Design and simulation of an active dc filter for high voltage direct current transmission systems(2015)
- Determination of morphological physiological and biochemical features of grape cultivars grown in Siirt region(2015)