Comparison of basics for determining seismic risk of building and Turkish Earthquake code
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
2015
0 views
0 downloads
Advisor: Yrd. Doç. İhsan Engin Bal
Abstract (EN)
In this study, eigth reinforced concrete frames and one 3D reinforced concrete structure were analyzed for determining whether a consistency exists betwene the two codes. All of the structures have different structural features, and they were subjected to the same level of seismic hazard. . For the all analyzes, the seismic zone is 1, effective ground acceleration coefficient (Ao) is 0.4, ground class is Z3 and building importance factor (I) is 1.All of the structures were calculated acording to the Basics For Determining Seismic Risk Of Building , Turkish Eartquke Code chapter seven linear elastic method andnon-linear inelastic method (pushover). After that, their seismic performances were determined and compared to each other to determine the consitency of three different and legally valid approaches.
Author
Burak Bayraktargil
Institution
How to Cite
Burak Bayraktargil (Master Thesis). Comparison of basics for determining seismic risk of building and Turkish Earthquake code, 2015, İstanbul Technical University.
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from İstanbul Technical University
- Removal and recovery of platinum group metals through anode slimes of moebius electrolysis(2015)
- Investigation Of Stretching Effect With Mixed Finite Element Formulations For Laminated Beams And Plates(2023)
- Fire safety measures in subways(2015)
- Gold and silver recovery from primary and secondary sources with different processes(2015)
- Fun palace as a laboratory of action/fun: Extensions and reflections of spatial experience(2015)
- İnce cidarlı kompozit kiriş olarak modellenmiş uyarlanabilir uçak kanatlarının dinamik analizi(2015)
