Afet sonrası yeniden inşa: 2023 depremlerin ardından Antakya'nın iyileşmesinde mimarların rolü

This thesis analyses the recovery process of post-disaster Antakya, the actors, distribution of responsibilities, and ambiguities in decision-making mechanisms within the housing production models, and examines the role of architects through the concept of accountability. A mixed qualitative method was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews and field observations. The design process in Antakya, claimed to be participatory but involving only architects, was observed to proceed through non-transparent verbal agreements with public authorities. This process prioritised construction speed over recovery efforts. Architects operated within a framework where the legal infrastructure was established through emergency decrees, disregarding zoning plans and urban planners. Despite being labelled as research-based, the process was far from participatory, advancing in a top-down manner. In this context, doxa refers to the common, unquestioned beliefs that architects used to legitimize the lack of accountability in their design processes. These doxas, frequently encountered in the propositions about Turkey's construction sector, bureaucracy, and society, facilitated the rapid production of standardised housing. However, this approach neglected long-term societal and urban resilience, local community participation and accountability. Consequently, this study highlights the necessity of scientific and participatory planning approaches, institutionalised practices, and strengthened legal frameworks to position architects as accountable actors in post-disaster reconstruction. Antakya illustrates the critical need for a more holistic approach to resilient cities.