Master'sOpen Access

The discretion punishments and the judge's authority to estimate them in Islamic jurisprudence

2020
0 views
0 downloads
Advisor: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Erdem

Abstract (EN)

This research investigated about to explain the discretion punishments and the authority of the judge in their estimation in Islamic jurisprudence, and this research divided into four sections. First section: investigate the meaning of Discretion (Ta'zir), its legitimacy, its purposes, types, and reasons for its drop. Second section: ınvestıgate the judge's authority to estimate its penalties, the criteria for assessing the sentence, and the meaning of the judge's authority. Third section: talks about the controls for assessing the discretionary punishment, considering the perpetrator, the victim and the felony, the officer of the motive for committing the crime, controlling the crime frame and the position of Islamic jurisprudence in the punishment frame, and the relation between the Sharia ruling and modern frames. The fourth section, investigated about restricting the discretion punishment, considering the provisions of the Sharia and its general purposes, restricting the judge to arbitrate by Qur'an, Sunnah and consensus, and restricting it to the purposes of general Sharia. Keywords: punishments, Discretion ,The authority of judge, Discretion controls, the fall.

Author

Dler Hama Kaka Bra

How to Cite

Dler Hama Kaka Bra (Master Thesis). The discretion punishments and the judge's authority to estimate them in Islamic jurisprudence, 2020, Fırat University.

License

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

This work is shared under the specified license terms.

More theses from Fırat University