Comparison of the effects of hybrid (tooth-bone supported) and conventional (tooth-supported) rapid maxillary expansion appliances on the dentofacial structures
2021
0 views
0 downloads
Advisor: Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Mehmet Ali Yavan
Abstract (EN)
Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of tooth-bone supported hybrid (HRME) and tooth-supported conventional (CRME) rapid maxillary expansion appliances on the dentofacial structures in late adolescents. Methods: The data of this retrospective study consisted of pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalometric graphics, posterio-anterior graphics and orthodontic model records of the patients treated with the need for maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion appliances. The first group consists of 15 individuals treated with HRME (9 girls 6 boys, mean age: 16.9 ± 0.42) and the second group consists of 15 individuals (8 girls and 7 boys, mean age 16.74 ± 0.54 years) treated with the CRME appliance. The dental and skeletal measurements were conducted on the records taken from the patients before the treatment (T0) and at the 3rd month (T1) after the treatment. Independent samples t and the Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the differences between the two groups. Paired-samples t and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the measurements at 2 time points for variables. Results: Significant skeletal and interdental expansions were observed in both groups (p <0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25) (p <0.01). When the amount of tipping in the premolar and molar teeth was examined, the amount of tipping in the premolar teeth in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35) was less than the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63) (p <0.01). The amount of tipping in the molar teeth was higher (p <0.01) in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03). Conclusions: Both expansion approaches were found to be effective in the treatment of late adolescent individuals with maxillary deficiency. Keywords: Rapid maxillary expansion, Hybrid RME, Tooth-bone RME.
Author
Dr. Mustafa Göktürk
How to Cite
Mustafa Göktürk (Dentistry Specialty Thesis). Comparison of the effects of hybrid (tooth-bone supported) and conventional (tooth-supported) rapid maxillary expansion appliances on the dentofacial structures, 2021, Adıyaman University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Adıyaman University
- The assessment of risk factors and sociodemographic characteristics of the children, apply pediatric emergency unit with febrile convulsion complaint and hospitalized in our clinic(2018)
- Evaluation of traditional total prosthesis, implant supported overdenture and "all-on-four" system applied to atrophic mandible wi̇th bilateral temporomandibular joint prosthesis using finite element analysis method(2025)
- Purin-pyrimidin fluctations of FMF disease (Familial Mediterranean Fever) and DNA(2010)
- Some classes of difference fuzzy numbers defined by an Orlicz function(2010)
- With the method of Van der Waals, ground state and excited states of the magic numbers(2010)
- Soft sets and some soft algebraic structures(2011)
