The Compensation of becoming from the agression to the right of mark
2006
0 görüntülenme
0 i̇ndirme
Danışman: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yaşar Can Göksoy
Özet (EN)
A trademark is any sign which can distinguish the goods and services of onetrader from those of another. Any sign is to be registrable your trademark mustbe distinctive for the goods or services and similar identical to them. Atrademark is a badge of origin, used so that customers can recognize theproduct of a particular trader and they always want them.To priate a trademark has been prohibited and juridical and punitive sanctionshave been provided by the KHK (Decree Law). In our thesis, we attempted toanalyze/examine the unliquited damages which derived from trademarkinfringement.The person/persons who priate the trademark or attack the trademark in theforms prescribed in KHK (Decree Law),are statutorily obliged ( are liable ) tocompensate the injury of the trademark right and to right the contradiction tolaw. When the attack is in question, the owner of the trademark right can claimthe pecuniary and the general damages and also farthing (nominal) damagesprescribed in the KHK (Decree Law). While accounting the pecuniary damage,compensatory damage and the non-acquired profit (income) are taken intoconsideration separately. The non-acquired profit is accounted according to themethod chosen by the demander among the three choiced right prescribed bythe KHK (Decree Law). General Damage (compensation or reparations)Principle is that ?amount of a compensation does not exceed amount of injury?.This principle is not inoperative in accounting the compensation by attackingthe trademark right. While accounting the compensation, the person whoattacked will be acquired profit by the attack and this profit may be boughtaccording to KHK. Although this amount possibly exceed damages of injuredperson. An important issue is that owner of trademark right must be loss ofprofit because of the attack or whether unfair profit of person who attacked thetrademark Right is coherent remoteness connection by act of aggression.Furthermore, while accounting the non-acquired profit, coherent additionalvicompensation may be made according to economical significance of atrademark.vii
Yazar
Dr. Banu Aliye Kocasoy Alkoç
Bu Yayına Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Banu Aliye Kocasoy Alkoç (Master Thesis). The Compensation of becoming from the agression to the right of mark, 2006, Dokuz Eylül University.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Lisans
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
Bu eser belirtilen lisans koşulları altında paylaşılmaktadır.
Dokuz Eylül University tezlerinden daha fazlası
- AFAD gönüllülük sisteminin etkin müdahale açısından analiz(2020)
- Hittite period ceremonial ceramic vessels and current applications(2023)
- Examination of martian habitats from the viewpoint ofstructure(2022)
- Nesnelerin interneti cihazları arasındaki iletişim güvenliğinin arttırılması(2021)
- The thoughts and practises of Atatürk's adopted daughter Afet İnan(2018)
- Design and vision based control of a mobile manipulator(2008)
