Consequences of limiting competition in private law field

In this study, the ?Consequences of Limiting Competition in Private Law Field?, which constitutes part five of the Law on Protecting Competition, is examined in terms of indemnity and invalidity, and the issue of indemnity, which is hardly implemented in our country, is elaborated. As a result of the damage in the competition medium, a chain reaction starting from the competitor enterprises descending down to the consumers takes place. The damage caused by this chain reaction should naturally be indemnified by the party violating the competition. Law on Protecting Competition clearly stipulates that a fine of up to three folds can be decided on in order to give a dissuasive manner to the relevant indemnity provisions. Invalidity gives rise to many different outcomes in many different situations and these outcomes are examined under headings in our study. It is obligatory to regulate today?s competition medium with a regulation containing the component of dissuasiveness and to keep under control by an authority. Especially day to day growth of the global capital and its efforts towards the emergence of an unstoppable monopolist structure reveals the significance of the indemnity concept in terms of dissuasiveness. For these reasons, our study is focused on such issues and tries to answer the possible questions