Siyaset, bilim ve hanedanlık tarihi: Thomas Ruddıman ve George Logan arasındaki tartışma
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
In the first half of the eighteenth century, the debate between Thomas Ruddiman (1674-1757), a Jacobite classical scholar, historian, political writer and publisher, and the Rev. George Logan (1678-1755), had political characteristics. These two people produced refutations of each other?s treatises. The major distinction in the political environment in the first half of the eighteenth century, which inevitably determined the course of the debate between Ruddiman and Logan, was that of Whigs and Tories. The purpose of this thesis is to go beyond this and evaluate the scholarship by contemporary standards. Also, in the study of these contemporary authors, we see the conflicts of eighteenth-century Scotland, which take centre stage in political narrative. Besides, we also inevitably note the similarities of their thought in response to the world around them.
Author
Cemal Alpgiray Bölücek
Institution
How to Cite
Cemal Alpgiray Bölücek (Master Thesis). Siyaset, bilim ve hanedanlık tarihi: Thomas Ruddıman ve George Logan arasındaki tartışma, 2007, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University
- Osmanlı Devletinde vergi ve vergi etrafında oluşan ilişkiler üzerine bir çalışma (16.-17. yüzyıllar)(2019)
- Rastsal kümeler ve choquet-tip temsiller(2021)
- Petrol fiyatları ve getiri eğrisi(2024)
- Yalnız yaşamak: Yollar, deneyimler ve gelecek beklentileri(2025)
- Detente dönemine doğru: Johnson Mektubunun ardından Türk dış politikası(2021)
- Geç Antik Çağ'da Aşağı Tuna: Histria örneği(2023)
