Master'sOpen Access

Siyaset, bilim ve hanedanlık tarihi: Thomas Ruddıman ve George Logan arasındaki tartışma

Is this your thesis?

This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.

2007
2 views
0 downloads

Abstract (EN)

In the first half of the eighteenth century, the debate between Thomas Ruddiman (1674-1757), a Jacobite classical scholar, historian, political writer and publisher, and the Rev. George Logan (1678-1755), had political characteristics. These two people produced refutations of each other?s treatises. The major distinction in the political environment in the first half of the eighteenth century, which inevitably determined the course of the debate between Ruddiman and Logan, was that of Whigs and Tories. The purpose of this thesis is to go beyond this and evaluate the scholarship by contemporary standards. Also, in the study of these contemporary authors, we see the conflicts of eighteenth-century Scotland, which take centre stage in political narrative. Besides, we also inevitably note the similarities of their thought in response to the world around them.

Author

Cemal Alpgiray Bölücek

How to Cite

Cemal Alpgiray Bölücek (Master Thesis). Siyaset, bilim ve hanedanlık tarihi: Thomas Ruddıman ve George Logan arasındaki tartışma, 2007, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University.

Keywords

License

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

This work is shared under the specified license terms.

More theses from İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University