الموازنة بين ابن عاشور والقاسمي في سورة الطلاق دراسة مقارنة

Surah Al-Talaq is one of the important surahs in the Book of God, and it was called "short Surat Al-Nisa" because it contained important issues that dealt with the issue of divorce, and the consequent provisions of the waiting period, breastfeeding, spending, housing, witnessing divorce, and returning to the husband. This study sheds light on this surah in two great interpretations: "Mahasin al-Taw'il" by Al-Qasimi, and "Al-Tahrir wa Al-Tanweer" by Ibn Ashour, as their sayings were narrated in the interpretation of the surah and collected what they mentioned about it, then a comparison was made between them and extracting similarities and differences The study also shows the approach of the two imams in their interpretation, and how they inferred explanatory, grammatical and linguistic issues. In all of this, the researcher followed the inductive, analytical, and comparative approach when tracing and comparing the two interpretations. He also used the historical descriptive approach when introducing the two imams, their scientific biography, and their two books. The study reached results, the most important of which are: During the comparison between the two books in the interpretation of Surat Al-Talaq, it became clear that Al-Qasimi relied heavily on interpretation by tradition, and he quoted it on this matter as al-Tabari, while Ibn Ashour relied on interpretation by opinion more, and his interpretation was dominated by the linguistic aspect. The two commentators also avoided Israeli narrations and weak and fabricated hadiths. As for the readings, Ibn Ashour did not stop at the seven readings, but took every reading that was valid, while Al-Qasimi did not mention only one reading in Surat Al-Talaq. Concerning the reasons for the revelation of the verses, both commentators dealt with the name of the surah and the reason for naming it, but Ibn Ashour expanded more. As for the linguistic aspect: Al-Qasimi did not delve into grammatical and syntactic issues, but rather referred to the syntax of vocabulary briefly, while Ibn Ashour expanded in mentioning the syntactic aspects, and he used to give preference to them and inferred from Quranic verses to support his words, and the two agreed not to infer poetry in the surah, As for the rhetorical aspect: Al-Qasimi's handling of rhetorical issues was limited and he did not delve deeply into citing rhetorical issues and did not mention a scholar on whom he relied from among the rhetorical scholars. Keywords: Interpretation (Tafsir), Ibn Ashour, Al Qasimi, Divorce, Comparison