The comparison of the Kur'aniyyon and mealism echo in tefsir

It is seen that the discourse of Qur'anism, which is a product of the modern period, has representatives and supporters in many Islamic countries, especially in India, Turkey and Egypt. It is understood that the Standard bearer of this discourse is the Qur'aniyyun in the Indian subcontinent and the Mealism school that emerged in Turkey. Representatives of both schools claimed that a judgment on religious matters should be derived only from the Qur'an. For this reason, the narrations outside the Qur'an, whic are in the tradition, have been ruthlessly criticized. The one that received the most from these criticisms was hadith-sunnah. However, it has been seen that both schools rationally interpret the verses that do not comply with the laws of nature, with the influence of modernism and modern science understanding, and harmonize them with the scientific data of the age. Since they did not accept tradition and sunnah as determinants in interpretation, they put forward very different views on issues such as the times of prayer, the number of rak'ahs, the amount of zakat and the time to be given, which are not explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an. In addition, they have given peoplelicenses that are not mentioned in the Qur'an, and they have taken a very liberal attitude at this point. Keywords: Qur'anism, Qur'âniyyûn, Mealism, Modernism, Sunnah, Tradition.