التفاعل الفقهي بين المذهب الزيدي والمذهب الحنفي في العصور الثلاثة الأولى

This study aims to address the issue of jurisprudential interaction between the Zaidi and Hanafi schools through a comparative study. The problem of the study lies in understanding the extent of agreement and differences between the two schools and their impact on Islamic jurisprudence in general. The study aims to clarify the common jurisprudential principles between the two schools and analyze the practical models in which their agreement is evident in various jurisprudential branches. The researcher employed a comparative methodology, comparing the principles and branches of jurisprudence between the two schools. Additionally, the descriptive and analytical deductive methodologies were used. The researcher utilized both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze jurisprudential texts from primary and secondary sources of each school. Modern techniques in data collection and analysis were also used to ensure the accuracy and objectivity of the results. The study consists of three main chapters: The first chapter provides a historical overview of the emergence and development of the two schools in the first three centuries. The second chapter reviews the common and agreed-upon jurisprudential principles between the two schools. The third chapter focuses on practical examples of the jurisprudential branches where there is agreement between the Zaidi and Hanafi schools in the areas of transactions, governance rules, jihad, sales, and imamate. The study reached several conclusions, the most notable being the significant agreement in jurisprudential principles between the two schools and in issues of jurisprudential branches. Among the recommendations of the study are to promote jurisprudential dialogue between various Islamic schools and to intensify comparative studies to bring viewpoints closer together.