Paulo Freire's conception of education in the context of critical pedagogy

According to Freire, education is a political tool. While some of the training models are used to monotamize and crush individuals, others are a tool used to escape from oppressed or fight for freedom. Freire has divided these training models into two, as a problem-defining training model with a banking training model. The problem-defining training model is a criticism of the banking training model. The banking training model is a training model that harms the individual, which does not allow the individual to differentiate and perform themselves. It is a model where the teacher hegemony over the student and educates the student in their own way and eliminates the possibility of self-fulfillment. The banking education model is the model that serves the ruling class and raises students in accordance with its ideology. This model is similar to a bank, the teacher is the investor who invests in the bank, and the student is the object that the investor deposits in the bank. The problem-defining training model is the opposite of banking training. In problem-defining training, students and teachers are equal. The teacher and the student relationship is based on dialog, and they learn about the problem being established by establishing dialog, and by going to the meeting path. The student is not considered ignorant and needy, and is considered an individual with student skills and a way to inform by the guidance of the teacher. The basis of these two educational concepts is the concepts of humanization, humanization, conscientizacao, praksis and dialog. Freire's aim in demonstrating its education is to end the crushing, alienation and humanization of the individual, raising conscious, free and free individuals who act.