حاشية ابن حمدون على شرح بحرق على لامية ابن مالك

This study bears the title "Footnote of Bin Hamdoun on the explanation of Bahraq for the ibn Malik Lamiat." (d. 672 AH), and its commentator: Muhammad bin Omar, the known also as Bahruq (d. 930 AH), and its commentator: Judge Muhammad al-Talib bin Hamdun (d. 1273 AH), then I introduced Lamyism and the small explanation, and footnotes to it. Then I concluded this section with talking about Ibn Hamdun's footnote, so I showed the differences of its versions, its most important sources, the traced footnote for the author and the commentator and other scholars, and the additions to the footnote such as answers to questions and problems, editing intractable issues, alerting the delusions of violators, jurisprudential reports, and weightings, and concluded it with a statement of the most important results that i found during the study. As for the second section, I devoted it to the investigation of the footnote, and I presented it with a description of the manuscript copies, then the investigation methodology and my work in it, I described the characteristics of the manuscript copies and explained the verses and hadiths mentioned in the gloss, as well as the couplets that the writer relied upon. I also provided descriptions of the symbols, marks, and abbreviations found in the gloss. Throughout the verses, I evaluated the conformity of Arabic diacritical marks and their placement. Additionally, I clarified the meanings of foreign words and explained the interpretations of ambiguous parts, and attributing it to it's sources. Moreover, I observed that the text of "Eş şerh ü sağir" was written in a smaller size above the gloss text, and I noted that the opinions in the gloss were based on references.