Comparing criteria weighting methods
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
Weighting methods, which are used to analyse Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problems, have an important role to decision makers for making the best and satisfactory decision. The aim of this study is to compare Max100, Pairwise Comparison and SWARA weighting methods according to their variability statistics on related criteria for an automobile selection problem. This study differs from previous studies by including newly developed SWARA weighting method. The study sample consisted of Uşak University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Department of Management academics and students. 139 people participated in the study. Data are acquired through surveys. The analysis of the data was carried out with Excel and SPSS 18.0 programs. According to the findings of the study, variability of Pairwise Comparison method is higher than Max100 and SWARA methods. In addition, Max100 is the easiest method to use whereas Pairwise Comparison is the most reliable method.
Author
Mert Durmuş
Institution

Uşak University
Division of Business Administration
How to Cite
Mert Durmuş (Master Thesis). Comparing criteria weighting methods, 2015, Uşak University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Uşak University
- Administration of participation in management and an application of industrial enterprises in Uşak(2009)
- The relation between bureaucracy and teacher?s efficiency(2009)
- The influence of the primary education administrators personal and organizational worthy accommodation on the dedicating and estrangement(2009)
- The levels of to be ready for change of primary schools (Uşak city sample)(2010)
- Elementary school teachers' reasons for not affliating themselves to teacher unions(2009)
- Urban geography of Vezirköprü (Samsun)(2010)