As one of the reasons for limitations on ownership: Public interest
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
The property right is one of the most fundamental human rights. In order to prevent the arbitrariness of limitations to be brought to the property rigt, this right has been transferred to the constitution, laws and international conventions. In our study, by examining the property right, the limits of the public interest are stated by referring to the concept of "public interest", which is frequently used in the limitation of the property right, and its place in the laws, international courts and international agreements. The place of limitations on ownership in constitutions, Constitutional Court decisions, Supreme Court and State Council decisions has been revealed and the attitude of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights on this issue has been examined. The obligations of states to protect the property right are discussed by analyzing the three rules used by the European Court of Human Rights in the interventions to the right to property. In addition, the wide margin of appreciation granted to the states by the European Court of Human Rights has been examined and the position of the European Court of Human Rights has been included. At the end of our study, it was concluded that as a requirement of the rule of law, laws should be made for the purpose of public interest and it was determined that the legislative acts should aim for the public interest as a state of law. By revealing that this issue is accepted by the Constitutional Court as one of the elements of the rule of law, it has been concluded that wide margin of appreciation granted to the states by the European Court of Human Rights is not unlimited, the discretionary power in our domestic law should be used within legal limits and justified, in accordance with the principle of equality, for the purpose of public interest, the use of discretion is subject to judicial review in terms of whether the elements of authority, reason, subject, purpose and form of the administrative act are unlawful or not. Keywords: Property right, public interest, rule of law.
Author
Merve Müzeyyen Eser Kapcak
How to Cite
Merve Müzeyyen Eser Kapcak (Master Thesis). As one of the reasons for limitations on ownership: Public interest, 2023, Çankaya University.
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Çankaya University
- Investigation of amazon and google for fault tolerance strategies in cloud computing services(2015)
- Investigation in MYSQLdatabase and NEO4J database(2015)
- Exchange rate and inflation relationship: The case of Turkey(2023)
- Effects of the economic news on herd behavior(2023)
- Experimental analysis of effects of different network parameters on TCP / IP networks(2025)
- Reconstruction of patriarchy through matriarchy: A critique of gendered power structures in Naomi Alderman's The Power(2025)