Comparative study of the curriculum for the secondary school physical education course prepared in 2006-2013-2017-2018
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
In this research, secondary school physical education and sports course 2006, 2013, 2017 and 2018 curriculum, vision and philosophy structures, aims, basic movement skills, measurement and evaluation approaches, learning areas, sub-learning areas and achievements, teaching methods and techniques recommended in the implementation of the program were examined. The program has been comparatively examined in terms of its relationship with the application instruction, intermediate and main disciplines. In the research conducted in descriptive design, document analysis technique was used. As a result of the research, it was observed that the 2006 curriculum was prepared at primary education grades 1-8, while the 2013, 2017 and 2018 curriculums were developed only for secondary school. It has been understood that the 2006, 2013, 2017 and 2018 curriculums are structurally similar, and the constructivist approach is adopted in all of them. It has been determined that the 2006 curriculum is more teacher and subject-centered than other programs, therefore it cannot adequately reflect all the elements of the constructivist approach, and grade levels are not taken into account in the acquisitions. It has been understood that there's no vision articulation in other curriculums, but for the 2006 curriculum, which the vision statement within the 2006 curriculum isn't precisely a vision statement. While statements such as simplification and revision were made in 2017 and 2018 curriculums from 2013, values education were included, similar gains were combined and their number was reduced, the program implementation directive in the 2006 curriculum, stakeholders, children with special needs, school opportunities were given in detail under different headings. It has been understood that it is considered as the principles to be considered in practice. It has been obtained that the teaching methods and assessment and evaluation methods and techniques in the programs have more student-centered and more reasonable capabilities for the constructivist approach from 2006 to 2018. Keywords: Curriculum, physical education and sports course, constructivist approach.
Author
Sevcan Çelik
Institution

Afyon Kocatepe University
Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Bilim Dalı
How to Cite
Sevcan Çelik (Master Thesis). Comparative study of the curriculum for the secondary school physical education course prepared in 2006-2013-2017-2018, 2022, Afyon Kocatepe University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Afyon Kocatepe University
- A study on the applications of viola educators on effective participations of student learning process(2019)
- According to the temettuât notebooks Nevâhî-i Barçin town's social- economic position(2008)
- İmamkulu Han's period in the Bukhara Khanate (1611-1641)(2023)
- A phenomenological research on the social suicide phenomenon from Byung-Chul Han's performance subject(2025)
- An examination of the life and performance style of Mevlidhan Bilal Demiryürek(2025)
- The services of XVIIIth century Ottoman proconsuls as the Hajj Emirate(2017)