A comparison of Süleyman Ateş's contemporary interpretation of the Noble Qur'an and Ebu'l Berekat en-Nesefi's Medariku't Tenzil and Hakaiku't Te'vil in the context of his classical work versus a contemporary interpretation conceptions

The Main source of Islam in the Holy Qur'an. The Prophet Muhammed was the first interpreter of the Qur'an. In this study, a comparative study is carried out in the context pf the classical period commentary Ebu'l Berekat en-Nesefi's Medariku't Tenzil ve Hakaiku't Te'vil and the commentary exegesis Süleyman Ateş's contemporary commentary of the Supreme Qur'an. Examination has been made. The main purpose of the study was to examine the two periods and to add a new one to the studies in this field by determining what kind of changes were made in field of tafsir, and which of this two periods was included in the comments of our commentators. As a result of our research, we observed that Nesefi stood in the classical line in his interpretations, and AteĢ sometimes made comments in accordance with the Ahl as-sunnat, and sometimes broke away from this line completely, and took part in the views of classical modernism. KEY WORDS: Süleyman Ateş, Ebu'l Berekat en-Nesefi, Classic Contemporary, Tafsir.